Does Allah hope that with his message of the Qura Essays - Islam

Does Allah hope that with his message of the Qur'an that everyone will eventually follow the Qur'an, and be Muslim? In His eyes, does a perfect world consist of only Muslim believers? Or, just peace among his people? (the acceptance and protection of other religions pg: 1807, not technically allowed to conquer more land without experiencing hostility pg. 1813) On page 1811, is cites the jizyah (9:29) "fight those who believe not in God and in the Last Day, and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, and who follow not the Religion of Truth among those who were given the Book, till they pay Jizyah with a willing hand, being humbled." However, in Surat al-Najm (53:38-40): "that none shall bear burden of another; that man shall have naught but that for which he endeavored, and that his endeavoring shall be seen, whereupon he will be rewarded for it with the fullest reward." Why are we permitted to fight those who do not follow the word of Allah, when at the same time, the Qur'an states multiple times that we are accountable for our own actions, and we must not worry of other's sins? On page 1808, this essay touches on how the Qur'an does not permit the coercion of religious basis and it states that Muslims are to preach peacefully. What does this say about countries of theocracy or under religious laws (e.g. Iran/Saudi Arabia)? Is it technically permissible to imprison someone for not practicing Islam correctly in the eyes of a justice system? Doesn't the Qur'an say that we can only be judged by Allah, and Allah only? November 14, 2017 Define Jihad: "struggle" in religious terms, it refers to the spiritual and guiding political groups and how they should interact Pg: 1806: Muslims did not respond in violence, instead, they were taught to be patient when persecuted, suppressed, embargoes, and even deaths that they endured Qur'an commands Muslims to "strive" Lesser struggle of jihad: physical violence Pertains to war, not entirely devoted to way; war is not your only solution: peace treaties There are rules that go in with war, it does not just mean free for all When is it allowed? To obtain peace When it is defensive: when you have been attacked and you retaliate (do not begin with violence) How is it fought? Against whom? Diplomacy, how nations communicate with one another War is not the goal, becoming a good warrior is not good War is primarily bad because it is propelling another harm, not peace When feeling attack of the self, you must not respond in violence, and then moving their lands Muslim brotherhood, using political processes to bring upon social change After the death of the prophet, Muslims began to take over many territories that were not gained solely through trade treaties: pg: 1813 You are allowed to attack another if you can ensure that people are able to practice Islam freely, or to spread the word of Allah to potential converts These are preemptive strikes to people who refuse to have peace treaties with you: an argument that supports offensive attacks only through a lack of peace treaties (defensive justification as well as offensive) The prophet says never kill someone who is non-combatant: immunity Children, women (women did not fight unless they really had to) If women were to actively attack you, you are able to fight back, BUT you should run away because the prophet forbade you Elderly Monks Mentally/physically capable to fight - handicapped Farmers, shop keepers, and not trained for the battlefield (including men) Greater struggle of Jihad: Ihsan, or spiritual path: you are commanded to always do this Spiritual struggle, Sufism Praying on time, giving zakat, obeying god and serving society November 17 In the Ottoman Empire, there have a multiplex system, where they have fundamental human rights and allow for multi-legal systems - each sect, and religion is allowed to go to the court of their respective beliefs Difference without needing to harmonize Imam Malik: wanted to enforce his book and law as the law - did not support the multiplex system

buy custom Starbucks essay

buy custom Starbucks essay Starbucks is a company established in the North America which has been dominant in the coffee sphere. The success factors of Starbucks in the early 1990s were very different from the factors that are today. Some of these factors include; product variety, experimental branding strategy, service innovation, compensation system which was considered to be of great quality, target customers, high quality coffee, and the availability of the customer service which had trained employees, hospitality, product quality, and clean environment. The Starbucks value proposition was very compelling because it prioritized customers satisfaction and proposed the creation of the certain ambience which was based on the community and unity of people. It promoted customers intimacy since it was obvious that the positive responses from customers and the increase in the coffee consumption among people on their daily basis influenced the production of the drink, which the customers really liked. The brand that they developed was a service brand which gave a promise to those people who were the potential customers and who could find a place where they could relax and enjoy a very good service (Moon Quelch, 2006). This proved that the brand image of Starbucks was very effective. The customers satisfaction regarding Starbuck has been declining over the years with the service of the company that is deteriorating. The sources of this decline in the performance is a result of the financial leverage drop, which has the ability to enhance profits, due to the presence of the very stiff competition, which is available in the changing market, and the aggression in the U.S. expansion. According to recent market researches, the company is not meeting all the expectations of the customers service as it starts debating on a plan estimated at about $40 million per annum. The set plan is aimed at increasing the speed of its services to customers by boostin the availability of labor in all its stores (Moon Quelch, 2006). The loss of the connection between the business growth and the customer satisfaction, the change in the customers tastes and preferences, and the changes in the market segment shows that the new customers of Starbucks often have a very different perception of the companys brand meaning which could also explain the reason as to why the customer satisfaction is failing drastically. It is the work of the senior executives of the company to manage all the marketing responsibilities where there was an ineffective data analysis for making decisions in the company. The company faced stiff competition from independent coffee shops which offered a range of foods and beverages such as beer, liquor, and wine, while others offered and delivered high personalized services to their clienteles (Behar Goldstein, 2007). Starbucks of today greatly differs from Starbucks of 1992 in a number of ways. This is because levels of difficulties in the production of drinks have significantly risen due to the increase and advancement of new technologies. It has changed a great deal in its distribution channels. However, it was only famous as the coffeehouse back in 1992, but it now has different distribution channels like restaurants, airlines, and grocery and warehouse stores. The company has also changed its product diversity, since it has expanded the variety of its coffee production such as tea and chocolate because of the increasing rates of innovation in the company. The increase in pressure on baristas has also changed in the company since there is the need to serve all its customers with extended hours of service where job complexity has created a tension between the customer focus and product quality (Behar Goldstein, 2007). Starbucks has slightly changed its value proposition since the initial value proposition of the company emphasized on customers sattisfaction above all other aspects in the business which called for good management. This is because the customers satisfaction in the company has been seen to be decreasing which shows that the services being offered by the company are decreasing as well showing that the customer is seizing to become the priority of the company (Moon Quelch, 2006). The change which I would recommend to Starbucks of today so as to be able to stay profitable and be able to develop a sustainable competitive advantage is that the company should adapt a leadership management strategy. In order for Starbucks to be successful in the competitive market, there is a need to have good innovative leaders who possess profound skills in decision making process of the company. Some executives are solely to be blamed for failures of the businesses and the companies that they manage because they prioritize the profit goal instead of the customers satisfaction goal. The customers play a very important role in the existence of the company. Despite the fact that the companys products may be of great quality, it still needs the customers to purchase its products. The reason as to why I have recommended the leadership management strategy for the Starbucks is that the executives of business are the leaders of the company and they have to act as role models in the organization. Leaders are the ones who are responsible for all the decision making processes and a good leadership management can lead to very good decisions that are likely to maximize the strengths of the company in realizing the companys goals. They have to come up with the companys internal and external analyses which is made up with the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the company, and then come up with good decisions on how they can be able to fortify the strengths of the company for its own benefit in terms of the profit margins that the company gets in maximizing all the opportunities. Buy custom Starbucks essay

Public & Social Housing PowerPoint Presentation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Public & Social Housing - PowerPoint Presentation Example Kemney’s views are mostly based on the integration of the market based practices into the social housing practices and how the regulatory environment can be tailored to make suitable changes. Accordingly, the respective adjustment of the supply and demand mechanism in the market and the government intervention into the market through political management of the cost control mechanism can ensure the stability of the market. An alternative mechanism presented by Kemney discusses about the unitary model wherein the suppression of the cost renting can be achieved through a comparison between the cost renting as well as the profit renting in the social housing. Thus the use of unitary model attempts to combine both the profit as well as the non-profit motives in order to stabilize the market and ensure that both aspects of the market remain within acceptable limits and help achieve the policy objectives of the social housing. The implementation of the unitary model is therefore, believed to be not creating the rent differentials which may occur in case of dualist model. His arguments also tend to focus on the influence of different pressure groups and the corporatism in the social housing market. As such different countries have different rental systems in place owing to the overall nature of their culture. For example, the system in UK is relatively different as compared to the countries like Sweden.

My life five years ago Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

My life five years ago - Essay Example The aspects that have changed in me include my maturity levels exceeding my thought boundaries. I never thought in my early teenage years that I would get matured this quickly. In just 5 years time I look like a young adult. I can sense things around me in a better manner than I was able to when I was just a kid. My personality has molded in such a manner that I have started to like it more and more. I have appreciated the difficulties of life now with my chin up and I seldom cry in the face of adversity. I can stand up and be counted – which was not the case some 5 years down the road. I have traveled far and wide with my parents. Europe is a continent that I have explored with my loved ones in my early teenage years. I remember each and every moment of my visits with my parents and I cherish everything about those journeys that we had. I can still remember the talks and conversations we had in those times with my parents and how we ended up laughing at the end of each debate and friendly mocking. We enjoyed different sceneries together and looked to find out about nature more and more. I remember my parents guiding me through thick and thin in those formative years of a kid’s life and I believe I am pretty lucky to be blessed with such loving parents. A lot in me has changed all this while. Though I lived in Egypt for the better part of my life, I feel that my upbringing has been affected in a positive fashion after I went to United States. I explored a new world and thus tried to comprehend things in a wholly new way. I aim to become a successful businessman just like my father who I believe is my living inspiration. I draw my encouragement and inner motivation from him and thus I believe I am what I am because of my father. I would do anything to go back in those times – 5 years back to be precise. I absolutely adore each and every second of that life which I had. Now life has become more sober and demanding. Earlier it used to be all fun and play.

Small and medium enterprises Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Small and medium enterprises - Essay Example An SME should give the primary importance to alliance and strategic partnerships at both local and global levels in order to increase the productivity. This will give a huge boost to the yield to cost ration which is the most decisive factor in any SME as they are required to fulfill some business rules and rules to survive in the emerging economic world of today (Nelson & Prescott, 2003). The paramount reason behind these success criteria is the fact that in the ever increasing global economic scale, the SME finds itself being in some tightened conditions thus experiencing jeopardy and limiting factors in the economic growth. Alliances with some partners will not only give them important horizons and resources to get a global exposure but it will also expand the business opportunities to increase the profit and lifetime of the business initiative. A very famous concept in business studies known as transaction-cost theory should be followed in order to increase the certainty level of the success of the partnership (Yasuda, 2005). This theory illustrates and suggests that the SME should make alliance with a partner that can minimize the sum of the fixed and continual costs throughout the business process. The famous example in this case can be taken that of Austria economy which enjoys almost 99 percent of the SME initiative which were at the start partnership based. (OECD, 2005). Similarly, the other success criteria are limited target marketing because e increasing the target market at the start.

Britain And Us A Comparative

Britain And Us A Comparative For my comparative essay of political systems in the contemporary context I have chosen the US republican system and the British constitutional Westminster system. Throughout the essay I will compare and contrast the different political systems, how they interact with one another and how the systems are significant in the modern day context of world politics. America, a former colony of Great Britain, won its war of independence in the year of 1776 and therefore was independent from Britain in terms of internal politics and overseas polices initiated into America republic, with the famous quote no tax without representation. From then on America became a republican state and now is arguably the most powerful state in the world in terms of military power, economic power and political power. It is necessary now to give a brief description of the American political system before we relate it to that of Britain and contemporary world politics. America is a federal democratic system made up of three bodies known as the pillars of American politics. The three branches present in the American political sphere are the executive branch, the legislative branch and the judicial branch. The executive branch is responsible for issues such as proposing legislation, formatting a cabinet and developing internal and foreign policies. The legislative is re sponsible mainly for finalizing many of the propositions coming out of the executive branch, and therefore wields much of the power within American politics. The judicial branch is responsible for legislative issues with the power to review legislation passed and acts as a guardian over the civil rights of citizens. As similar within the Westminster system, there is a lower and upper house but this is notably where there is a large contrast between the two systems, as the American upper house holds much more significance in terms of power within the political system. As previously mentioned the political system consists of a lower and upper house, the lower house being the House of Representatives and the upper being the senate. The house of representatives is largely responsible for internal issues of legislation, budgetary issues such as allocation and foreign policy, where as the upper house, known as the senate initiates and regulates much of the what is proposed by the lower ho use, therefore acts as a balance of power within the American political sphere. The American electoral system should be mentioned in order to compare and contrast to that of Britain, although not into too much detail. Ultimately, party delegates are elected by citizens by popular vote using the voting system of proportional representation, where delegates need a majority vote to become a party delegate. The party delegates are then responsible for the procedure of presidential elections where the delegates vote for who will be the party leader to be legitimate for a presidential candidate. Through this system, it is regarded that an indirect electoral process is used in terms of the presidential elections as the average citizen is not directly responsible in terms of the determining the outcome. Once the presidential candidate is initiated it is ultimately down to the Electoral College system, a system where the people contained within it are representatives of individual states and have the final vote of determining the winner, a system not used within Britain. As for the parties themselves, there are two main predominant ones, that of the Democrats and that of the Republicans, one being left centrist (Democrats) and one being right centrist (Republicans), both arguably contrast slightly and lean in a similar direction in terms of policy implementation leading to a stable system of consistent politics within America. A final note on America contains that the fact there is a post independence written constitution as to determine how the country should be run internally, as with most established republics, also an element of American politics not present within the British system. A brief description of the British system will now be confronted in order to begin the process of comparing and contrasting the two systems as a whole. Within Britain there are three branches upon which consist of the executive branch, the legislative branch and the judiciary branch which is very similar to that of America. Within the Westminster system the executive branch is made up of ministers who run the country and are responsible for proposing legislation, developing foreign and internal policies and is headed by the Prime Minister, who chooses which ministers compose the cabinet. The legislative branch is the elected body upon which passes laws that are proposed from the executive branch, it should be mentioned that all government ministers are members of the legislative branch. Finally there is the judiciary branch upon which ensures that laws that are passed, are obeyed and has the power to review laws and works independently of the government and headed by a senior ministe r. The Supreme Court is the highest court within the political system of Great Britain. The British parliamentary system is bicameral meaning, there two chambers present, that being the lower house or the House of Commons and the upper house which is the House of Lords. The house of commons consists of 650 seats which are occupied MPs who meet daily for about half the weeks of the year, where opposition parties have a opportunity to challenge the current governments policies and general governing of the nation and the political nature is based around transparency and the public sphere. Those who make up the executive branch are those who attend the House of Commons meetings where, the majority of the time the PM and his cabinet and members of parliament will attend the proceedings, which is chaired by a speaker who monitors the meeting s and keeps order. The House of Commons is the house with the most authority within British politics. The House of Lords is the more exclusive house but does not possess the ultimate political authority and largely is based on noble tradi tion and status. It acts as a check on the governments activities and has the ability to revise legislation that has been passed through the House of Commons but essentially cannot block the will of the House of Commons. Like mentioned before, membership is exclusively reserved by the elite class or the nobles who are appointed by the queen, with advice from the government, which contrast from that of house of commons where MPs are elected into the house. Like America there two parties which have dominated politics within Britain, one being the labor party, which is traditional working class party leaning to the left and the other being the conservative party which leans towards the right, both mainly centrist with slightly differing views mostly, that of public spending reforms. The Liberal Democrats have always been influential with their presence but failed to be an overall competing power within parliament until the recent coalition with the conservatives, who are now in power. Within the electoral process itself, first past the post is the system used through most of England and Wales at the regional and local levels, where a candidate representing a certain constituent is voted on the basis that one person equals one vote, with the majority winning. The political party with the most constituents will form the government, who will take the majority of the seats within the House of Commons. The runners up form her majestys royal opposition, who will take the remaining seats within parliament. Within Scotland and Northern Ireland however, the voting system used differs from England and Wales. Scotland uses a mixed system called the additional member system, where voters usually get two votes, one for an individual candidate and one for the overall party. With Britain being a constitutional Monarchy, the queen is officially the head of state but does not wield much political power and rarely interferes within the political activity. The House of Lords would be the main involvement within her political activities through tradition, as historically the monarch would appoint House of Lord members, but as previously mentioned the House of Lords holds less authority over the House of Commons. To finish a description of the British political system it should be mentioned that, unlike America, Britain does not have a written constitution but rather a build up of traditional folk laws with modern additions to previous concepts of how the country should function in terms of the monarchy, politics and civil society in the modern contemporary era. Now to compare the two political systems which have been described, being that of the American federal republic system and Britains parliamentary system within a constitutional monarchy. Similarities are easily distinguishable whilst looking into the formation and functioning of the political systems with respect to those who function inside and out of the overall system. At first it should be noticed that the political structures contain all the same elements of an executive body, a legislative body and judiciary body, where the framework embodies that the executive branch is responsible for the proposal and development of legislation and the initiation of policy formation. The executive branches are within the lower house where in both systems, wield much political power. However it is quite clear that within the contrasting systems, the power of the lower house differs with respect to the balance of power between the upper house and lower houses. With Britain, the House of Commons is ultimately the most influential body and is not, in theory, open to checks and balances of a higher authority, as the legislative branch consists of government ministers, whom of whic h initiate legislation and policies. Within the American system although the lower house is responsible and has the power to propose such issues, the Upper house or the Senate, has the ability to initiate the proposed legislation, which is largely through the legislator finding sponsors within the Senate, which is not the case within Britain. With these checks and balances present within the US, it ensures power is spread across the political arena and power is not subjected to one body. This leaves many implications as the reasons for why these differences occur between the powers of the upper house. It could be argued in the case of Britain that the House of lords is not elected by the people or in fact, by anyone with political significance and the members themselves may lack the political experience to wield such power with interfering within politics and would act as a hindrance due their own conservative biases. With Britains political culture, represented as a stable democrac y under a hereditary power, emphasizes the irrelevance of the nobles to enter into modern day politics, with a feudal upper house system. America political culture of strong democracy and liberty is found within the context of the Senate and the House of Representatives, as both are elected in for a predetermined term in office, if all members of the upper and lower house are elected, the need for a balance of power is necessary for full representation, which is brought through the culture of democracy. This leads me to now consider the voting systems and electoral processes with respect to the nations under consideration. Very clearly both the US and the UK have constituted democracy as their political system, but there are some clear cut differences that need to be examined. First would be that of the process of electing the prime minister or in Americas case the president. Within both systems the party leadership is not determined by the civilian population but party delegates; however it could be argued that within Britain, through the first past the post system, a PM is directly elected by the people once the gene ral elections come underway, as apposed to the American Electoral College system, which determines the presidency. This has implications as to why the PM has unwieldy power of choosing their own cabinet members and has the ability to determine when elections shall be held as long as it is within five years. As they have been democratically elected by the people without hindrance within the first past the post system to represent the nation as a unitary state, it leaves no question to the conditions determined within the political process. Within the US, the Electoral College system creates the idea of an indirect process of a presidential election within civil society, where there have been cases where the winner has not even won the majority of the vote, but key state votes. With this voting system in place, it is key that the balance of power is established within the system so state representatives still have the ability t o protect the rights and interests of the civilian popula tion, who ultimately will not be completely subjected to the rule of a president, who does not represent their interests. This is prevalent in the idea of state arguably, being able to hold a form of autonomy from the central government and are able to initiate independent state laws and policies, which helps uphold the democratic political structure within the US. England does not face this problem as a unitary state due to size and devolution of the nations which constitute Great Britain, as they share similar political freedoms to that of states within America. Although there are similarities and contrasts within each system discussed, one thing is concrete, that both countries hold democratic values as political culture which goes hand in hand with the liberalist approach to world politics, which is evident how the two countries discussed throughout the essay have interacted in the contemporary age as strong allies. With the idea of international peace, the installation of democracy and strong trade orientations America and Britain have supported each other in several conquests, such as that of the Middle East where the two allies have fought with the idea of crushing terrorism and installing democracy. The two nations have never vetoed one another within issues brought forth within the UN security council and have managed to uphold good relations arguably, through the favoring political cultures upheld by political stability installed though democratic principles within both nations. Although there have been criticisms by many that Britai n is the 51st state of America, it reflects how the two countries function with respect to one another.

Essay --

John Hodges Ms. Roney World Literature 4 December 2013 Brave New World Essay Truth and happiness share a relationship of not knowing the truth, which only makes people happier. The people of the new world lost their freedoms but in return receive many pleasures. This thus adds to the apprehension of knowing the truth. They don’t want to know the truth because they are trained not to and it seems like they don’t want to know the truth, either. To avoid ever knowing the truth they use soma. By taking somas, they avoid truth whenever they are frightened by it. It in turn conceals their sorrows and instead fills them with fake hallucinations. In the story there are two types of truths. One type of truth is related to human relationships and emotions. Emotions and relationships give people great happiness, but they also can cause a great deal of pain. Due to these pains, no one forms relationships with the opposite sex. Along with this they consider it abnormal to feel attachment to someone. There are no couples or families and the idea of chastity is strongly banned. The oth...